Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard did not close the door on the possibility of former President Barack Obama facing criminal charges over what she’s describing as a “treasonous conspiracy” [Russian interference in 2016] against President Donald Trump.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The projection here is killing me! Yes, let the treasonous people talk about other’s “treason”.

  • Pratai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard…

    This, in-and-of-itself, is an oxymoron and by merit of its own incompatibility with reality, needs to be dismissed as an irrelevant statement- and never written, or spoken aloud again.

    Fine if you want to think it, but you really shouldn’t.

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Gabbard in my opinion is not a stable person. A co-worker once tried to convince me that she should have been elected. I know this person was crazy because they watched RT.

    Sure… you keep telling yourself that.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wasn’t she essentially deemed compromised by Russia by our national intelligence? Absolutely insane she got confirmed. Anyone who voted to confirm her or any of these dangerous picks need to be primaried and eventually face criminal charges IF this mess ever gets fixed.

    • womjunru@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Treason charges. If we can see the plot, that means it’s only the tip of the iceberg.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      As long as Trump is on it the optics will be bad. Everyone knows he is a child molester, but we can’t come out and say it in the media. This shows us that we are just being fed propaganda. When you can’t speak the truth everything becomes lies.

  • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lol the argument is literally that Russia did not have the “tools and resources” to influence the US election?

    Fuck right off, Tulsi, you Kremlin shill. Who the fuck is actually going to believe that?

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Russia did not have the “tools and resources” to influence the US election?

      I think this statement is true. Facebook ads and DNC malware didn’t shift the dial. Paid Russian protesters are about as effective as any other political protester.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember when people used to laugh at international dictators for making up bullshit kangaroo court cases against their political rivals?

    Anyway, how’s those pedo-files coming along?

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I didn’t think people laughed at that. More like, “humans can be so evil.”

      The other reaction—if you’re a conservative—is this, “Yeah we should do stuff like that here!”