Marjorie Taylor Greene explained just how much demands to release the Epstein files have increased.

  • PidgeonHanging@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am all for it… but I wish people would get this passionate about healthcare, the environment, education, housing, and all the other things that are suffering in our society.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        A pedophile ring for the 1% in which everyone knows they’re doing it and no one does anything to stop it doesn’t matter?

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It doesn’t if the Kingpin of that ring is a king above the law. Literally a waste of time.

        • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’d argue a pedophile ring isn’t as important as stopping an environmental collapse or making sure the entire population has access to Healthcare. The irony being the 1% a responsible for all of them

          • phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah funny how those with an excess of wealth and a lack of morals seem to be behind so many terrible things in the world…

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            You know we can do more than one thing, right? Like, it’s not one guy who has to go around arresting the pedophiles, fixing climate change, and establishing wealth equality. In fact, no one person is expert enough in all three to really be the person for the job!

            We can do this all at the same time. Take a breath and stop getting in the way of something that is finally starting to see results.

            • davitz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Establishing clear priorities doesn’t mean that you can only do one thing, it means that if circumstances require you to choose one thing over the other, you have a well reasoned framework to make that decision even if you really want both things.

              Also no one was saying, “we need to stop being mad about Epstein so we can focus on healthcare” they were saying “it’s a shame that people didn’t get as mad about healthcare as they did about Epstein when it’s clearly the higher priority problem”. It’s actually them advocating that we should do more than one thing, and that the fact that we’re only doing one thing is made even worse because it’s the thing that’s lower priority.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 hour ago

                A lot of people are trying to deflect from the issue, even comments here, where have you been? They’re so desperate to get the world away from the topic that they’ll say just about anything. It’s very similar to the “why do we help refugees and not our own elderly people” argument that exists only to hurt foreigners and comes from the very people who get in the way of social safety net improvements all over the world.

                Right now this issue has momentum, and since they haven’t been afraid of climate change all this time then it looks like the pedo ring is their weakspot. Why attack where their armour is the strongest when they have a gaping hole in it staring us in the face?

                And as far as the topmost comment in the thread is concerned, a lot of people are that energized when it comes to the other issues. Sure it’s not MAGA folk, but expecting them to care about others is a losing game.

            • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              You say that but how well does governments handle multiple problems at once? In a perfect world we could but this world is far from perfect

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Really well? Most governments might show off one at a time but have you ever heard of a thing called a “department” and that there are several of them of them doing different things?

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            It doesn’t matter what your cause of choice is, someone is always going to say something else is more important. However, saying human trafficking doesn’t matter at all? That’s a pretty dickish statement.

            I agree, it would be nice if Republicans cared about more of these things, but human trafficking is also a major issue.

            • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              No humans to traffic if the ecosystem collapses. There is a scale of what problems are most important. I’d agrue preventing the destruction of our species is more important than any crime committed by a group of individuals. That being said you don’t just ignore all the other problems. You just priorities one over the other