The party of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele approved constitutional changes in the country’s National Assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms to six years.

Lawmaker Ana Figueroa from the New Ideas party had proposed the changes to five articles of the constitution. The proposal also included eliminating the second round of the election where the two top vote-getters from the first round face off.

New Ideas and its allies in the National Assembly quickly approved the proposals with the supermajority they hold. The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed.

Bukele overwhelmingly won reelection last year despite a constitutional ban, after Supreme Court justices selected by his party ruled in 2021 that it allowed reelection to a second five-year term.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Instead, invited to the White House, admired and celebrated, and used as a model for the USA’s own dictatorship and gulags.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Focusing just on the constitutional changes: it’s a bad sign when your constitution can be changed by a single political party.

    In El Salvador’s case they have a unicameral legislature and Bukele’s party has 54 of the 60 seats. So, there’s no way to prevent this by requiring a bigger supermajority.

    But, it seems like since a constitution is meant to last as long as the country exists, amendments to it should have to be reaffirmed or they get automatically repealed. So, there’s an automatic re-vote after 5, 10 and 20 years or something.

    If they had done that with prohibition in the US they wouldn’t have needed the 21st amendment to repeal prohibition, they could just have decided not to continue the 18th which established prohibition.

    With a dictator as president, and absolute control over the legislature, I would bet that those guys are also going to make it impossible for any other person to win a presidential election, or any other party to win the legislature. And then, the only way to restore democracy will be a coup or an uprising.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      But, it seems like since a constitution is meant to last as long as the country exists, amendments to it should have to be reaffirmed or they get automatically repealed. So, there’s an automatic re-vote after 5, 10 and 20 years or something.

      That would pretty much go against the point of a constitution. It’s meant to be both extremely hard to change it and extremely hard to revert changes put in as a matter of how it’s done(though never impossible -that would be bad).

      You can only put as many safeguards in as possible to prevent dictatorships, but if they control more than 2/3 of the government your screwed no matter what laws you have on the book

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        if they control more than 2/3 of the government [you’rre] screwed

        That’s why I think confirming after 5, 10 years might be a good idea. A supermajority is rare. Unless the supermajority screws with the laws to guarantee they stay in power, the next congress might have enough votes to undo any meddling they did. If they do cement their power, then you’re screwed either way.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Thanks for the grammar correction 🙏

          Ah, so do you mean it as a one time confirmation rather than repeating? In which case I’m a lot more inclined to agree with you

    • pezhore@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      As a counter point, the US would have to re-vote for the 14th Amendment.

      As a counter counter point also the 2nd.

      You know, I think I like the established way of doing amendments - passes by Congress and a plurality of the states.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    So they just voted to - well, not quite dismantle democracy but at least open the doors wide for dismantling it.

    Almost unanimously.

    That’s so fucked up.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      But many more civil wars.

      Though now that poverty isn’t as bad there, not sure if there’ll be another. Then again, the French burning cities is as constant as Salvadorians going to war with their government.

      Too bad the fucking USA keeps intervening.

  • Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    It certainly seems like democracy as a political system is being replaced by authoritarianism worldwide.

    I don’t know if we can reverse the trend without some kind of disastrous world war that will inevitably result when world-altering decisions rest in the hands of just a few men.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Of course.

    If you’ve ever seen any interview with Bukele it becomes immediately apparent he’s just another dictator wannabe who was very lucky to accidentally do something good immediately after being elected for the first time. Now he’s riding that wave until he re-ruins the country again.

    He doesn’t even understand why his policy worked. He just repeats the “tough on crime” bullshit.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Because Bukele abolished the law and effectively turned the government of El Salvador into one giant gang. Of which the results now become rather apparent.

        His rival cartels did not stand a chance.

      • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        He threw everyone in jail, guilty, innocent, didn’t matter. Those innocents were worth it according to Salvadorans. He lowered crime rates by suspending liberties. You know who else did that? Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, etc

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        He treated the situation as a civil war rather than a criminal matter. What do you do in war? You go after all enemy combatants, you don’t try to determine if one specific soldier killed any of yours. Anyone in enemy uniform is a legitimate target unless they surrender.

        El Salvador gangs do have specific ways of visually distinguishing themselves even if those are not traditional uniforms. Of course there are people wearing the same clothes and tattoos just because they think it’s cool, but that is unfortunately a darwin award case.

        In this context the captured are not in prison but in a POW camp. What he’s missing is an exit strategy. Eventually you have to establish a permanent peace and release the POWs under some conditions. Not to mention obey the Geneva Convention which enumerates some rights. That’s why he’s always framing it as being tough on criminals.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          This completely omits the other part of his strategy which is paying bribes to gangs to chill out and giving cushy treatment to participating members who happen to be incarcerated. Since they typically fight over money (directly and indirectly) this seems to have quieted things but I can’t see this lasting forever. People will get greedy and break the peace eventually.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Eventually you have to establish a permanent peace and release the POWs under some conditions

          Not when you’re totalitarian dictator

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Of course there are people wearing the same clothes and tattoos just because they think it’s cool, but that is unfortunately a darwin award case.

          Yeah fuck them for wearing colors they liked.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            I get where you’re coming from but if you were to fly to Ukraine today, put on a Russian uniform, and walk around you’d have a bad time.

            But this is only applying to those that continued to wear these things after their government declared a war on it’s own citizens.

  • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The party of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele approved constitutional changes in the country’s National Assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms to six years.

    USA right now: Don’t get any ideas, Trump!