Its ALL free speech, except political speech. That’s not free, there’s a fee for that. PAYG
If you want to see a populace uprise and hang you from street poles. Go ahead and remove their rights because that’s how you get a populace uprising.
Here’s the original article
https://theintercept.com/2025/09/13/marco-rubio-revoke-us-passports-terrorism/
Does that mean it’s a shortcut to expatriation, without having to pay the exit tax?
If someone has some meme with the face of “JD” “Vance”, does that mean no passport?
Please read H.R. 5300, SEC. 226. NO PASSPORTS FOR TERRORISTS AND TRAFFICKERS
So free speech is terrorism now?
Not yet
This article gives no information about the status of this bill, or even the number for the bill so you can look it up yourself.
Covering bills like this at the point of introduction is pure fearmongering. Anyone in the legislature can introduce a bill. Most bills go nowhere. Unless it leaves committee or gets co-sponsors, it’s not really being considered at all.
If something happens with this make sure to pay attention. But covering this at this point is just trying to make you afraid to get a click.
Yes, wait until “something happens”. That’ll certainly leave enough time to counter the avalanche of bullshit that rides the apparent complicity of silence on the matter as it built up momentum.
Genius. 🖕🏻
Mast — a former soldier for the Israel Defense Forces who once stated that babies were “not innocent Palestinian civilians” —
TFW you increasingly can’t distinguish between cartoon levels of villain and actual terrifying psychopath
“I wonder if this guy looks exactly like I imagine?”
Damn, just look at that thick ass throat.
Hmm maybe I should get dual citizenship
I can’t wait to read the legal gymnastics the SCOTUS is going to barf out to OK this!
“You see the 1st amendment only protects the party in power…”
“If that speech makes the leader of the country sad, then it cannot be protected by the Constitution he’s sworn to uphold!”
“Because of this precedent we’re choosing to interpret completely opposite to its history being taught in law schools, the 1st amendment only protects registered Republicans. But, and this is important, this isn’t setting precedent. This is a one-off. You know, legal no backsies!”
In reality, they’ll probably just refuse to take it up if the most recent federal appeal comes down the “right” way. Because they’re cowards. Like most of the government.
Or dump it into the shadow docket and say it’s ok with no justification at all.
Seems like a laughably unconstitutional law but this supreme court will probably let it fly if passed.
The time to disobey is far behind us. If you aren’t causing a ruckus in your local community you aren’t doing enough.
Don’t post pictures of text
Alt text added.
Small government in action. Controlling your word and actions.
Man I remember a time when Republicans were actually conservative and not fascist Nazi’s.
I don’t, and I’m old.
Lots of baby steps in this direction, which started when Reagan sought to win the Christian Right.
Time to start my covert Detroit river crossing business
Ah yes the freedom party
