• Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Since Palantir has all the voting registrations linked to all the social security numbers, Musk raided and kept all our sensitive data, and the age of the draft has gone up, how much you want to bet the government suddenly drafts only the younglings who happen to be a Democrat to fight and die in his war?

    • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The drafts throughout history in many countries have always been done this way to varying degrees. It is partially seen as a way to mow the lawn as the elite class would see it. Whoever the undesirables are at that point in time get to go into the meat grinder first. Most recently, Russia has done this in Ukraine… Sending convicts, minority groups, poor people, etc, to the front line. Modern systems now would allow specific targeting of a draft to political opponents, specific areas of certain groups, and so on.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      There is a problem with that.

      Data from early 2025 indicated that voters aged 18 to 21 favored Republicans by roughly 12 points, a sharp contrast to those aged 22-29, who continued to lean Democratic.

      So they need to make sure to only draft 22-29 if they truly want to try to skew elections.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        I wonder how much that has skewed - and very much for the typical narcissistic reasons - since then. But yeah, if they go by old data, they may find they have to “draft” older people.

  • MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    9 hours ago

    10 years ago, a statement like this from ANY potus would have turned into a month off front-page freakout. Now? It gets a one-second shrug.

    Fuck. Where we are now. So quickly.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      I doubt it would have applied to the cons.

      IOKIYAR.

      Newt and his team have been working to divide America since at least 1990. Actively. And it gets little mention. Meanwhile, plenty of reactionary centrists and nearly all of the mainstream media and of course the unhinged right wing would say things like “Obama is divisive” as some kind of serious analysis.

      Meanwhile, the cons have been intentionally trying to divide. And were not called on it every single day, as they should be.

      The GOPAC memo “Language: A Key Mechanism of Control” is something every American should be aware of, but I bet maybe 1% are.

      So if earlier asshole GOP POTUSes were to blurt this out before, it would probably get bothsidered and downplayed back then, too.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not even 10 years ago tbh… If Biden said this when he was president, Republicans would inexplicably become the number one advocates of healthcare and childcare and screech endlessly about him being a warmonger for several news cycles.

      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s not “10 years ago,” because it has nothing to do with time passing. It has everything to do with Republicans doing a coordinated and concerted capture of all media.

        It goes away because they want it to - the silly non-news used to stick around for a month because of their manipulation. It’s important to remember and talk about this widely

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Don’t worry, everyone.

    The Treasury just declared the US is insolvent. We can’t afford the WARS either.