• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Lets be honest, hand guns were pretty much banned before. Nobody wants to call the cops twice every time they go shooting.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No they were not. And you didn’t need to call the cops to go to the shooting range, it is included in the RPAL.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          https://rcmp.ca/en/firearms/firearms-safety-training-transport-and-storage/authorization-transport

          Changes to automatic Authorizations to Transport restricted and prohibited firearms were brought into force on July 7, 2021. This change now requires licenced owners of registered firearms to obtain an Authorizations to Transport from the provincial or territorial Chief Firearms Officer (CFO) in order to transport a restricted or prohibited firearm** to any place other than to:**

          a. an approved shooting club or shooting range within the owner’s province of residence, or

          b. to the firearm’s place of storage after purchase.

            • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You cannot shoot a restricted anywhere other than an approved shooting range.

              Non-restricted weapons have very little control in Canada. This is why a lot of people were pissed at the constant addition of more and more guns. Guns that were non-restricted suddenly became prohibited. These kinds of sweeping bans are not good. Hell we could do away with a lot of bans in canada but just keep the licensing scheme. That is working well enough. There is simply no need to ban semi-autos at all.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                I was going to do a deep dive into the legislation to figure out WTF I was remembering here, but it’s been kicking around my inbox for a full month now, so I think I have to give up on that.

                I don’t think I ever laid eyes on one myself, but I did talk to shooting buddies who bought a restricted and then regretted it. I guess it’s possible they were just exaggerating, but there definitely was something about having to call movements in.

                The legislation we have here does make no sense, although that can cut both ways if you want to own something weird. I never got the PAL myself but I’ve thought about getting a specific kind of blackpowder musket that would be banned in the 'states.

                • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You want to know what is even weirder? Since you mentioned blackpowder firearms?

                  A flintlock musket, even an modern creation of an old design (such as the Brown Bess musket of the American Revolution) there are no regulations at all in Canada. No paperwork, no license, no registration, nothing. Even people with criminal records are not forbidden from owning them. A person with a history of domestic abuse, assault, and armed robbery can still get one legally.

                  But… flintlock pistols are (now were due to the freeze) treated exactly as modern pistols are. Meaning they need to be registered, locked up with trigger locks and carried in locked cases.

                  I find that preposterous. Even if flintlock pistols were freely available criminals would not bother using them. In several European countries (such as France) firearms DESIGNED prior to 1880 require no permit to buy or own. This means that cowboy movie lovers who own newly made colt SAA revolvers only need to register their guns but no permit needed to buy or own.

                  Despite this, there are next to no crimes in France committed with them. I should mention that many companies still make new revolvers of that kind, so it isn’t like they are using 19th century vintage makes.

                  It is fucking stupid.

                  And also seeing the liberals (and I voted liberal last election) trying to make bill C2 is only making my blood boil.