• shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Having a criminal history would likely make him ineligible.

      There’s no outright rule against it but several people have been removed from the order for committing crimes.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only thing I didn’t like about the liberals is the needless gun control they enact that basically banned almost all semi-auto rifles and halted new sales on handguns.

    Of course I want them to fucking solve the housing crisis. Holy shit! Finding a place to stay is insane. They better do that at least.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Lets be honest, hand guns were pretty much banned before. Nobody wants to call the cops twice every time they go shooting.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No they were not. And you didn’t need to call the cops to go to the shooting range, it is included in the RPAL.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            https://rcmp.ca/en/firearms/firearms-safety-training-transport-and-storage/authorization-transport

            Changes to automatic Authorizations to Transport restricted and prohibited firearms were brought into force on July 7, 2021. This change now requires licenced owners of registered firearms to obtain an Authorizations to Transport from the provincial or territorial Chief Firearms Officer (CFO) in order to transport a restricted or prohibited firearm** to any place other than to:**

            a. an approved shooting club or shooting range within the owner’s province of residence, or

            b. to the firearm’s place of storage after purchase.

              • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You cannot shoot a restricted anywhere other than an approved shooting range.

                Non-restricted weapons have very little control in Canada. This is why a lot of people were pissed at the constant addition of more and more guns. Guns that were non-restricted suddenly became prohibited. These kinds of sweeping bans are not good. Hell we could do away with a lot of bans in canada but just keep the licensing scheme. That is working well enough. There is simply no need to ban semi-autos at all.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I was going to do a deep dive into the legislation to figure out WTF I was remembering here, but it’s been kicking around my inbox for a full month now, so I think I have to give up on that.

                  I don’t think I ever laid eyes on one myself, but I did talk to shooting buddies who bought a restricted and then regretted it. I guess it’s possible they were just exaggerating, but there definitely was something about having to call movements in.

                  The legislation we have here does make no sense, although that can cut both ways if you want to own something weird. I never got the PAL myself but I’ve thought about getting a specific kind of blackpowder musket that would be banned in the 'states.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even more unaffordable for an American. They need to have bankroll to survive a year without income and that includes covering possible medical expenses for 3 months. I have friends who have wanted to move here for years and the hurdles are large even with skills and secondary education. Only those with highly in demand educated skills get an easier path.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No different in America, and corporations are buying up homes so they can jack the prices up even higher. MAGA wants a population of renters so that they can control us by threatening us with homelessness.

    • twice_hatch@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can but they won’t let my friends in. I didn’t realize until I looked into it but national borders are actually quite rigid

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’d have to build new roots in a new place. I’ll admit I worry that I’m running out of time for that at my age, or at the very least the window is closing.

        Makes me feel pretty depressed. I’m not super happy with the landscape of people I have to interact with. I have a lot of decent friends but I feel like the number of very close friendships I have is zero due to a lot of major value differences and low population.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m feeling the same way. I’ve been mostly “stuck” in wherever I just ended up. Part of me really does fantasize about fleeing somewhere better, especially being in a part of the US with an absolutely abysmal education record (and it shows. Oh boy.)

          But besides the resources, I don’t have some ultra compelling reason for a non-volatile nation to bother letting me in.

          There’s cool people here, and I try to get along with whomever, but forming relationships feels really high stakes these days since contested politics and tribalism is infecting every facet of peoples’ lives.

    • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know how it works there. Was Pierre running in two races?

      Would there have a special election for this seat if he had won both?

      What are the odds he loses support and goes quiet after losing both, especially his backup incumbent election? (Knowing hard losses used to discourage people, but not always now)

      • Someone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No one actually “runs for Prime Minister”. The Prime Minister is simply the leader of the governing party. That is determined by the number of seats each party wins. The PM is almost always an elected MP, but as demonstrated for the past few weeks they don’t have to be.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Prime Minister is similar to Speaker of the House- everyone gets elected in their district and then the majority party (or in the case of a functional democracy multi-party system, a coalition of parties that add up to 51% of the elected officials) picks their own Speaker/Prime Minister without further input from the public. In practice, if you’re already the party leader then you’re sure (95%~) to be the prime minister after your party wins/gets the biggest share in the election

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Bro I need gaslighting lessons from PP; how is he losing his riding, losing an election he has polled 20+ points in the lead in for almost two years, and yet gives a speech where he not only says he will stay on as leader, but makes it seem like losing the election was his desired outcome??

    Really sad about Jagmeet and the NDP wipeout tbh. I know why it happened, but if I’m not mistaken the universal pharma and dentalcare we have now were initiatives pushed by the NDP that the Liberals get credit for because they were the ones holding the PM seat.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jagmeet was getting wiped out regardless. The fatigue that existed for Trudeau was also present for Singh and Pollievre.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      but if I’m not mistaken the universal pharma and dentalcare we have now were initiatives pushed by the NDP that the Liberals get credit for because they were the ones holding the PM seat.

      No one who has any political awareness would give the liberals credit for that. That was the NDP’s contribution.

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No one who has any political awareness would give the liberals credit for that. That was the NDP’s contribution.

        A lot of voters aren’t aware. If it’s not being blasted on repeat by a news channel, then at least 50% of the electorate has no idea what’s happening. We’re also so inundated with American politics that Canadian news gets drowned out as well.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Same as universal health care… it was an NDP initiative that the Liberals took nationally.

        Without the NDP, our Liberals suck… which is why I am sad after this election (still happy PP won’t be around)

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m hopeful that it really is just a temporary thing given the Trump situation and with a new leader and that behind us (might take more than 1 term of course) that they’ll be able to come back stronger and make the Liberals advance things they wouldn’t otherwise again. Also you never know, maybe they’ll get some leverage with the current set up, but seems less likely for this term.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Agreed… I only vote Liberal when I believe the Conservatives are getting dangerous and the Liberals have a chance to beat them.

            I will continue to support the NDP with my vote and wallet in the future

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestley, I was going to vote conservative, even after Trump. And then Pollievre went into third gear with Woke Derangement Syndrome, the guy was having unhinged rants. Couldn’t get a paragraph out without mentioning woke. Ask him to define it, and he’d either PP.EXE stop responding, or he’d fly off the handle with pre-programmed slogans.

    Stupid people on both sides of the race. But that was what turned me.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        the last 4 elections I’d voted L > C > C > L

        Im a moderate. I thought that the Trudeau Liberals had gone too far left back during the Scheer and Otoole days. Come this time around, I just lost any confidence I had in the Conservative party because they built their identity on “we’re not the liberals”. and failed to convince me they werent just going to kowtow to American Corpo-Fascist interests.

        But if you would have asked me about specific policies that irked me to turn Conservative during the past … its been a long time, I’d probably just point to specific times and incidents over the gun policy, immigration, corruption with the SNC lavalin scandal, and maybe foreign policy. I live in a very ignorant and uneducated town in a NS riding that had been pretty hardcore conservative the last 2-3 elections, and my peers probably played a hand in influencing my issues. I thought our riding was solidly going to remain Conservative, CTV projected Cons won, but several hours later they reversed it and Libs have apparentley won it.

        Foreign Policy has always been a major “issue” of mine too, Until 2025 when we were faced with the nonzero possibility of actual aggression and conflict with America, the biggest thing that would influence my vote was how seriously the party was going to take the issue of us being more or less, de-facto at war with Russia, Because the “shadow” World War III is something that in my mind took precedent.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The big key is gonna be if we get that sweet 172 seats with Lib+Green+NDP, we are only 1 seat short

    If we hit that mark it means, hilariously, the one single green seat is needed to form a majority government without bloc’s help needed

    Which will force liberal party to play ball with NDP and Green Party’s more progressive policies.

    That’s our ideal scenario, conservatives are told to go kick rocks, and green/ndp get an actual voice on decision making to push the country in a progressive direction.

    One. More. Seat!

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Currently it seems like there is a highly improbable but mathematically possible outcome where the Conservatives and Bloc Québécois form a government. Canada gets to be the 51st state and Quebec gets to be the 52nd state. 💀

      Let’s get that last seat! edit: typos

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bloc have endorsed the liberals already, Quebec is extremely anti trump.

        Bloc aligning with conservatives would be political suicide lol.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s why I said highly improbable. But if they became states it would be the end of Canadian politics. It would be all American politics at that point. edit: typo

          • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think Quebec will recognize Trump’s rule if he takes control of Canada. It may result in some occupier deaths.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Somehow I don’t see Quebec deciding anything that favors a party that wants everyone to speak English.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Narrowly.

    Are you guys not horrified of what’s happening south? If you interpret this as a win and go on, your country is going to be mega conservative in like a decade.

    No, this is an existential crisis, and you need to shut off the propaganda machines before it’s too late.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Quite true. The reason for celebration is that had the conservatives won they were planning to defund our public broadcaster right off the bat. We need all kinds of reforms but having the CBC around to report on them will be quite important.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. Incumbents always do worse in the next election. Makes me shudder to think what the result of the next election is going to be. Trudeau’s latest term was really bad and they got no punishment for it whatsoever thanks to the gift from the south. And Canada seems to be moving further and further away from proportional representation. So who will voters swing to next election?

      Great result for today’s Canadians. Terrifying result for future Canadians.

      • AtomicPinecone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would point out though that a CPC win would have been a terrifying result for future AND current Canadians. So I guess that’s a small win?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s after a full decade of Liberal rule. Do you know how hard it is to win after that long being blamed for everyone’s problems? This is huge.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Finally something to celebrate in this general vicinity. Congratulations, Canada.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    this outcome has less to do with trump’s actions, and more to do with how the conservatives behaved in spite of those actions.

    I think enough people were like me, ready to vote conservative, but then lost faith in the party since they didnt really seem to have a plan on anything once trudeau was gone early. Pollievre’s stock tanked once people saw that Trudeau was gone, and what was happening in the world

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Genuine question, what initially led you to wanting to vote conservative and what could they have run on for you to have stuck with then?

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Explain how they gained more seats then.

      The conservatives barely lost because the progressives and the BQ voters cut their legs off to hoist up the liberals.

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We’ll see if the liberals take Quebec for granted like NDP did after Layton.

        • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’ll be important. We’ll also see how Canadians react to the atrocities the USA will commit in the next 4 years too however.

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t know that ‘Conservative’ exists anymore. I’m American, but I think these comments work everywhere else, as Authoritarianism rises.

      Growing up, I believed that liberal/conservative was just a difference in approach, but not a difference in end-goal. Both ‘teams’ wanted the country to prosper. In my 40s, now, I clearly see that we have different goals: Liberals want everyone to be prosperous, healthy, fulfilled. Conservatives value the prosperity only of those on top.

      You may identify as conservative, little ‘c’, respect tradition and be careful with spending, etc; but I want you to closely evaluate the actions of people using that label across the globe. A vote for a conservative or right-wing candidate is a vote for the top 1% or less of the population of the planet. They may align with you on some topics, such as religion, abortion, fiscal policies, regulations, and more; but that is a ploy and they are absolutely willing to throw you away as soon as they have your vote and will cut everything you depend on once in power in order to pad their own pockets.

      There are certainly perverse incentives and systemic issues that make even liberal politicians support bad policies, but the voter bloc that is ‘liberal’ wants to make things better for everyone. The conservative politicians, at least in the US where I’m paying attention, seem to be hell-bent on making things worse instead.

      This has less to do with Trump’s actions, and more to do with how the convervatives behaved…

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The line between regressive and conservative is so hard to define. However the former certainly is in ascendancy in America.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I cannot wait to see how the Trump admin will spin this. Either that or they have a meltdown and immediately call it a rigged election. Bonus points if he tells Canadians to storm their capital.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are 100% going to say our election was rigged, and our idiots are going to believe them.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        excerpt of facebook comments Ive seen since last night

        • “this country is a disgrace”
        • " sad day for canada"
        • “fucking rigged!”
        • “west time to become 51st state”
        • “alberta saskatchewan manitoba 51st state of USA!”
        • “time to secede”
        • “trump will save alberta”
        • " insert conspiracy here already picked their candidate, our votes dont count"
        • “time to leave”
        • accusations of Chinese meddling
        • accusaions of European meddling
        • accusations of Globalist meddling
      • boydster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Please, I am begging you, do not make this sheet. Right wing media will pick up on it, the golden one will catch wind of it, and it will become an achievement checklist. Please do not.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ll be a little surprised if he addresses it more than a passing comment - the US conservative population doesn’t actually give a shit about canada (unless they’re told to be mad about it for some specific scapegoaty reason, but they’ll just forget. Like they’ve all forgotten about the lumber issues, or eggs, or how ‘canada is killing the US garment industry’ that one was cute…). At this point he’s got enough other things to distract them with, so why waste his very limited attention span on something he’s declared a solved issue?

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It wasn’t by a large margin… Canadians are turning fascist just like a lot of other countries.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, we narrowly avoided going down the Trump route this time, but I don’t find this picture particularly encouraging (NDP, Green and BQ are the three most progressive parties):

        Change in seats between last election and this election (projected)

        Source: National Post

        It’s not straightforward to understand that, since this is a chart of seats not votes, and you can get weird effects with first-past-the-post and strategic voting, but it certainly looks like the electorate is moving rightwards at the expense of progressives.

        • cornshark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe the left is realizing that they are fighting for really critical human rights, their autonomy and their country, so it’s time to stop splitting the vote among marginal left wing parties?

          • Lazhward@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            But splitting the vote isn’t an issue with proportional representation is it? If the libs lose one seat to the greens that’s still one seat not occupied by the cons.

          • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think the answer to the corrupting influence of America’s rotting republic is to become a two party system.

              • Fred_Flinstone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Electoral reform would be a good start. Ranked Choice isn’t perfect, but it’s easy to implement and much better than our current system, asvwe build appetite for a truly progressive voting method.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Certainly there’s a lot of strategic voting going on. But you don’t see the Liberal (centrist) seat count increasing as the NDP goes down: the gains are all with the Conservatives. If it were a matter of progressives deciding to just consolidate with Liberals, you’d expect to see the Liberal seat count go up as the smaller parties went down. To me this suggests either that some people are flipping directly from left to right or that there is a general rightwards drift, with right-wing Liberals going over to Conservatives and left-wing strategic voters filling in some of the gap they leave for the Liberals. In either case it’s concerning that when the Conservatives fielded their most far-right leader so far, their share of the seats went up.

            • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              In either case it’s concerning that when the Conservatives fielded their most far-right leader so far, their share of the seats went up.

              It’s not surprising at all, the 2 conservative parties in Germany are the most far-right and second most far-right parties. They host politicians who are grandsons and granddaughters of real Nazi SS officers (like the leader of the AfD: Alice Weidel, her grandpa was directly responsible for thousands of civilian deaths as military judge and prosecuter and later chief military judge for Adolf fucking Hitler. They copy their talking points one to one and would love to see people dissappear, who are not looking like them. Conservatives, for the most part, are atrociously far-right.

        • hazardous_area@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          On what planet is the BQ (bloq quebecois) a progressive party? NDP and green for sure.

          Bloc are literally a Quebec only nationalist/separatist. The cons are angry at them because they “stole” a bunch of their Quebec voters/seats. If that’s your target audience you aren’t on the progressive end of the spectrum.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloc_Québécois

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            In the policies section of the page you link, there are a number of positions that are typically associated with “progressive” politics.

            • hazardous_area@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              And a broken clock is right twice a day. Just because a couple policies from a party are progressive doesn’t overwrite the fact that their founding tenants are hyper nationalistic (if you count Quebec as an independent nation).

      • Amberskin@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Until social networks are mare criminally liable for the crap they spew this won’t be turned around.

      • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m hoping the margin was tight because most people, even the ones who voted liberal, held their nose as they did it. We don’t like a party being in charge for this long, but the alternative is worse and worse every election. Pierre poilievre was however the worst and most dickish conservative I’ve seen in a while, so I hate how close this was.

        • Steven McTowelie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Both Jason Kenney and Andrew Scheer, the two prior Conserrvative leaders, also completely blew their chances of winning by relying on the rightwing outrage pipeline and by being completely unlikable as a human beings.

          Side story, I worked in government and received an MP complaint against me by a client, and the MP was Jason Kenney. I had to talk to him a bit everyday for a week or so, and he came off as incredibly stupid. Blew my mind a year later when he was on a ballot lol.

          • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was asked by a conservative volunteer why I wasn’t voting Con, I told him to write it down for the higher ups “I will never vote for a candidate who makes up cute little trump style nicknames for his opponents like carbon tax carney, and that any politician who rallies against woke culture has brain worms”

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hopefully Australia follows suit, as we have our own Temu Trump in opposition coming into our election.

    • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes, it is so relieving that this right wing populist trend seems to be failing in our closest neighbor. Hopefully the failure of this administration will wake a lot more places up, and create a greater push back against this trend to the far right.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’d have to be trying hard to forget your media literacy to think that was spin.

      It’s a device that’s saying the Trump issue is the major one in the election. Trump, and how voters feel about him, is what is driving one party or the other to victory.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I did read the article and indeed the content is about what you say. On the other hand, I don’t know if titling this as “Canada might be the second election Trump wins in six months” is an attempt at sarcasm, click-bait or spin (pretending not to know the number of people who will only ever read the title). It’s sad that I now I jump directly to believing the latter so I do hope that I’m wrong

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s an analysis piece, an interesting or provocative headline is the thing to have.

          People really have forgotten how to read news media in the past few years.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Daddy hasn’t told them what to say yet and these kinds of outlets don’t know how to think for themselves anymore. And at this point it’s pretty much all news outlets based out of the US don’t know what to say without him.