• SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    I was thinking that maybe the US could use three presidents - West, East, and Center, each heading up a major chunk of territory. SCOTUS could be expanded to have 50 justices, each state appointing a single justice to represent them on the supreme court. The presidents each could select a single head justice, whose job is to communicate the viewpoint of the executives, and to write up the conclusions that SCOTUS factions have reached.

    That sort of thing should help maintain the intention of the Constitution, where branches - or rather, interests, constantly jockey against each other, thus being equal. The problem with our current politics is that too much power has been concentrated into the hands of too few people, essentially destroying the balance of branches.

    • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      West, East, and Center, each heading up a major chunk of territory

      Fuck no. Don’t lump us minnesotans in with basically exclusively red shithole states.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Isn’t that what the states are for? The federal government is supposed to maintain basic security and then the states are supposed to do all of the actual societal work but it all seems to have fallen apart. To be honest it had fallen apart long before Trump.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Yes that’s how it’s supposed to work. People like to point at Trump but Trump would not have been able to do this were it not for the fact that every president before him has given itself more and more power. He’s simply an opportunist.

        This is also the thing Republicans have been harping about for ages. They don’t want to tear down the federal government because they want people to die or because they’re “fascists”. They want to tear it down because its current iteration of it has far more power than was ever intended when the constitution was drafted and it empowers and makes tyranny possible.

        The New Deal needs to be replaced with something new that decentralizes power from the federal government while keeping the social nets that were established.

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah I’m starting to think that a triumvirate is the way to go for the office of the president. Let’s have a head of state, a head of government, and a head of _____ idk. But the job is too intense for one individual and we need an escape hatch while also having stability. So we could impeach the head of state but keep the head of government so shit still gets done during that transition.