My lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days ago

Republicans shut down House floor to avoid Epstein vote

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
108
link
fedilink
1
external-link

Republicans shut down House floor to avoid Epstein vote

www.newsweek.com

Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days ago
message-square
108
link
fedilink
Committee Democrats had planned to force a vote on a resolution calling for the public release of Epstein-related documents
  • moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The Democrats are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. There’s nothing there, nothing of importance, and the Trump administration has already asked the courts to start working on the release, so there’s no point in the House getting involved anyway.

    This is such a non-issue that the Republicans have shut down the entire legislative session and won’t vote on any of their own bills until September. Again, Democrats are just trying to make a show out of nothing, which is why blocking it is the Republicans’ top priority. Their work would be redundant anyway, which is why the Republicans are so unafraid to vote on it that everyone just up and left.

    On an unrelated note, my favorite local restaurant is so clean and compliant with all regulations that when visited by the food inspector they turned out the lights, locked all the doors, and refused to serve any food again until the health department leaves. As one does when they’re unafraid and have nothing to hide.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Relevant WKUK

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Had me in the 1st half, ngl

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Dear diary,

      Today someone was sarcastic on Lemmy and people liked it. Big day for the fediverse.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        They were clear about it. Most people just write a bad take that reasonably suffers from Poe’s law and call it satire when everyone else gets mad.

      • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I literally looked at the upvote as I was reading and had to question if it was sarcasm because it hadn’t been downvote into oblivion…

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I had to check if I was in a hexbear thread.

        • Steve@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Me too! Its a handy satire indicator

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        fr. I’ve actually been surprised by how little people are around here seem to understand sarcasm

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          We’re a pretty neurodivergent crowd. I thrive in sarcasm, but a lot of us come with different care instructions

          • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s not the only blockage to noticing sarcasm, there are so many people who say these / the things and actually MEAN them. We need differentiators, because the crazy levels are too high to wade through.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              That is a difficulty. Sometimes you take a risk with a joke, and if people don’t like it? Guess what, they’re right. Humour is subjective.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Please tell me you’re being sarcastic.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Read the whole comment instead of jumping to conclusions.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

        • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          If I was jumping to conclusions, I would have accused them. That’s why I’m asking.

      • moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I take it you didn’t finish reading?

        • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You have no idea how many times I’ve been wrong before. Just double checking.

    • Omnifarious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      You had me in the first 2/3 there

      • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 271 users / day
  • 1.45K users / week
  • 3.1K users / month
  • 4.92K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 24.9K subscribers
  • 2.49K Posts
  • 41K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org