When the accusation means the death penalty with no trial, nobody is safe

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    When have Americans ever given a single fuck about Latin Americans? Except to overthrow their governments when they goddam feel like it. Trump murdered some rando Latinos on a tiny boat with an outboard motor with like, an aircraft carrier, and broadcast it online. Americans literally give absolutely zero fucks if he does illegal shit to them, why would they care if he annihilates brown people.

    The US is a rogue fascist country.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look, since every pig on the street has that power, it only makes sense that the president does too

  • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    So he wants the ability to kill suspects. Can I want the ability to have him killed?

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just how many kids did he rape??? Now he’s KILLING PEOPLE in order to detract from the Epstein files!

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you forgot that Trump just likes killing people, regardless of the Epstein files.

      Bill Barr literally had to dangle death row inmates he could put to death in front of Trump like keys for a baby to get him to focus on certain things. Literally having to bribe him with murdering people to get him to pay attention.

      Trump would be doing this anyway, don’t give him weak excuses like he’s trying to cover something up. He is a fucking monstrous person plain and simple.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That raises the question of whether Mr. Trump has legitimate authority to tell the military to summarily kill people it suspects are smuggling drugs — and whether the administration allowed career military lawyers to weigh in.

    Eat shit NYT, fuck this sanewashing bullshit. "Raises the question"my ass! He absolutely does not have the authority because the law fucking says so! Why does the media bend over fucking backward to lick their own assholes by acting like these are even questions to be answered‽ They have completely abdicated their duty as journalistic media. “Fourth estate” absolute bullshit capitulation to rogue powers with dictatorial intent.

    • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Extra judicial killings are bread and butter for US presidents, made really popular by Obama.

      This is of course fucked, but there are clear precedents for presidents killing any one, including US citizens, they name a terrorist.

      • absentbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The deaths from Obama’s drones were no less judicial than the deaths from Bush’s troops, both were carried out within the definition of the ‘war on terror’, which was approved by Congress.

        Trump’s strike on that Venezuelan boat was outside of the approved scope.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Obama killed US citizens who were in Al-Qaida and ISIS training camps. I’d have done the same. Those fuckers are fair game.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          US citizens are innocent until proven guilty. We do not allow our leaders to Proclaim guilt and execute even if it is overseas. We should have the same policy for foreigners as well. Anybody who thinks they can trust our politicians and leaders to execute people based on their own reasoning is quite mistaken.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            We should have the same policy for foreigners as well.

            So when we were storming the beaches of Normandy, we put each Nazi soldier shooting at us on trial first? Funny, I don’t recall ever reading that we did that.

            Or going back a bit further, what about those Confederate soldiers? They were all US citizens, even if they claimed otherwise. The US government never accepted the fact that they were anything but insurrectionists (which is all that they were). It’s only the Confederate framing that claims they were an independent state during that time.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fighting battles in a real war and intercepting civilian ships and international waters and killing everybody on board is not the same thing. It is an incredible argument to compare storming the beaches at Normandy with shooting a small boat out of the water in the Caribbean right now.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You got it all wrong. Extra judicial killings outside the US are Gucci. Inside the US you’re only allowed judicial killings and obvious ‘suicides’.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Some idiot in Houston decided he had a right to summarily execute a child for playing a harmless prank

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but he’ll most likely go to jail for murder. Call me crazy but I don’t think that will happen here.

      • EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        In Texas he’ll probably get a quick draw award. Do you know how fast those kids run? Dude must have been chomping at the bit for years to end one of those quick, little fuckers.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does drug smuggling usually result in a death penalty if convicted? If not, then it shouldn’t warrant execution without trial

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Regardless the accused have a right to defend themselves in court, the authorities do not establish guilt juries do. In or out of the us, citizen or no.

      Unless self defense, they are not calling that specifically to set precedent of extrajudicial killing with armed forces. Next stop stateside.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fuck everyone who clapped back at me when I said Bush and Obama’s extrajudicial killings would come back to bite us.

    Habeas corpus for all.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Bush and Obama had the legal cover of the original Congressional AUMF from 2001. That has now finally fully expired.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No they did not. They started wars all over the place but simply did not call them wars. All without congressional approval.

        Trump can do this so easily because they made it possible to kill anyone deemed a terrorist. All Trump had to was expand the definition of terrorism to include drug dealers.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah well Trump has the legal cover of “I can do whatever the fuck I want” immunity which has fully not expired. Worst case they just tell him he can’t kill people like 3 years after he killed a bunch of people and he just says “no.”

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like the administration is going to have any legal backing, it will probably center on the rights of stateless vessels. Does the President have the right to use lethal force against pirates in international waters?

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          The US has universal jurisdiction to prosecute pirates and to seize their vessels. Seize does not mean “sink.”

          As far as I know, they don’t have a lot of facts in this case to spin into a “the bad guys escalated a law enforcement boarding operation” scenario.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            While sieze doesn’t mean sink explicitly, the argument is going to go to what acceptable force can be used against a stateless vessel not complying with an order to be boarded for inspection.

            It is also international waters, not American soil. Legal protections in international waters are likely smaller than legal protections on American soil due to how international diplomacy created the law of the sea.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              The US will disregard international law. The US also never ratified the un law of the sea.