• mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    12 days ago
    1. The law applies only to office holders, candidates, campaigns, or to people who buy or sell political advertising.
    2. People and platforms who post and distribute content without exchanging money are exempted.
    3. All the big media firms: tv, radio, ISPs, Internet content platforms, and billboard operators are exempted when they just run someone else’s ads. The people who are liable are the ones who place the ads.
    4. The requirement is to include a disclosure message when depictions of a public figure have been altered by technology: Photoshop, AI, deepfake audio, or whatever else. The content itself is not censored, it just has to be noticed that it’s artificial.
    5. “Superficial” alterations are exempted from the notice message, for example, changing the color balance on a video.
  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’ll say it until I’m dead: fines need to be calculated by income and net worth, increasing exponentially. The only way for a fine to act as a deterrent is for it to cost more relative to a person or company’s ability to pay it.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    Lol. Have fun trying to enforce that while real crimes are happening.

    Texas set to overtake Florida for America’s redheaded stepchild.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      The trick is, they don’t really care about enforcing it - just having it as a potential charge to pursue when they hate someone.

      This just in: Breathing is illegal. They’ll only bother prosecuting critics of Trump though.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      As always with these laws, they are a tool designed to be used selectively against someone you already decided you don’t like.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    For the filthy rich, the ONLY penalty is very often a fine, and it’s a very small one proportionate to the profit they made from the crime. It’s the cost of doing business.

    The filthy rich only do jail time if they bilked other filthy rich people out of their money.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    That penis was actually there, not interpreted, don’t do this. The penis was tattooed right on his face.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    “herp derp jerb creators deserve to be above the law!”

    What our robber barons have convinced many to most Americans to believe to spin their greed disease into being somehow noble, and what those robber barons unreflectively believe about themselves.

    There are developed nations, which we most certainly are not, that literally prorate vehicular fines as a percentage of income. We would never do that here, because this shithole, including tens of millions of self-hating, deluded fools, believe the person that exploits thousands of laborers for private profit deserves to risk your life doing 90 on main street on the basis of their successful exploitation.

    https://www.mic.com/articles/79039/the-untold-story-of-alice-walton-s-dwi-incident

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      The very definition of neo-liberalism: neo-feudalism. They can do whatever they want. Rules are for us, the serfs, not for them.