It became the only reliable source of information I had. People posted links with a minimal amount of commentary, picking and choosing the best content from other social media networks. They’re not doing it to “build a brand” because that’s not a thing in the Fediverse. It’s too disjointed to be a place to build a newsletter subscription base.

  • jama211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lmao, you think THIS is a good place to get news? Half the time it’s just reposted reddit ahahahaha

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Australian Subreddits got overrun by extremist right wing people who tend to be 20x louder than anyone else, and exaggerate everything.

    One even reported me for being racist (successfully) despite the fact that the entire time I was fighting back against the racism

    Even worse, you now need to log in to even see it at all in a mobile browser. So f that

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was perma banned for calling someone “A fucking piece of human garbage” as they openly and brazenly advocated for the death of trans people.

      I got banned, the person calling for Trans people to be killed did not.

      • auzy1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s unfortunately pretty standard.

        Whereas, on Facebook, nobody gets banned. I’ve literally reported people inciting violence towards others. However, it seems permitted by community standards these days

      • auzy1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah. And they were apparently “never going to win in SA either”. Everyone was happy with that result. SA is happy they lost, and ON supporters were somehow happy with being absolute failures too 😂

  • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s also one of the most nitpicky whiny places you can visit. A new open source software/update just got released and it does something cool! “Well it’s not {x} compliant so it’s trash.” Or “If a solo developer or a team decides to use ‘AI’ then their entire project is AI slop.”

    There are so many moments where I’m like “just shut the fuck up and enjoy the software/news/updates these strangers are providing for free.”

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    See I had forgotten the one golden rule of capitalism. To thrive in capitalism one must be amoral. Now you can be wildly sickeningly successful with morals but you cannot reach that absolute zenith of shareholder value. Either you accept a lower share price and don’t commit atrocities or you become evil. There is no third option.

    Spot on.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I watched a Greenlandic toddler munch meat from the spine of a seal with its head very much intact.

    I kind of want to know the context of this

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even better.

    Most instances have human moderation, gating for bots, and yes, and you actually have to take 5-10 minutes to figure out how it all works, so the stupid people are automatically excluded by sheer complexity.

    I fucking love Mastodon.

    • cookiecoookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Stupid people can just use AI, so nothing is truly barred, not like it requires more than a 3rd grade reading level either. Your post being upvoted this much shows how easy it is for the average NPC to make an account.

    • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know you probably didn’t mean this, but I don’t think accessibility barriers are good. Diversity of thought is strength and bad comments naturally sink to the bottom.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        After seeing how many terrorist ideologies have been allowed to thrive by claiming First Amendment protection since 2016.

        No.

        “Diversity of thought” my ass. I’m sure your wonderfully-diverse thoughts are just what all of us need to hear, but if they can’t pass muster under human moderation, they’re not worth platforming.

        • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Pretending these comments only come from “stupid” people is abelist and provably false.

          I am defending those with barriers, not fascists.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is weird ass article. It’s like the author has never used an Internet forum before and didn’t understand how the Internet works.

    Don’t stop at the Fediverse. Keep going. You’ve only just begun.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    And it has not enough users. If the fediverse ever became popular enough to hold significant marketshare, we’d see similar issues. The upside to the frdiverse is that you can defederate from misinformation peddlers.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fediverse doesn’t (as of yet) have a monetization path because of it’s “self hosted” structure - I put it in quotes because most people use large instances, but anyone can spin up their own and federate.

      The big risk with this is that if it reaches a critical mass where advertisers see potential for profit, the mechanism that would be most convenient, especially with LLMs, is bots.

      Say Toyota wants to promote their new car. They contract an advertising agency, who spins up a few dozen LLM agents trained on Lemmy data and instructions to talk up the latest new car. It might make posts, or just comments, but in all cases it will eventually promote that product.

      All that for the cost of a few tokens, and the only giveaway would be the “AI phrasing”, if anyone catches it.

  • fizzbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    People complain about Lemmy having limited content and engagement. Not in this article so much. I’m sure there were fewer posts in the past too. But what I found is that there are real people on here and you don’t have to wade through bots and shills which makes this community feel much more whole to me.

    • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I actually like the slower pace. There’s no constant stream of content but I find that helps me to moderate my usage. It also helps me take a more active role because I don’t just see what I’m subscribed to. I’ll hop over to the top posts over the last 6 hours and find something that’s really hot elsewhere, or I’ll hop on to scaled and find something obscure. It’s slower and cranky but it embodies a lot of the old elements of scrolling that I miss.

    • solrize@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lemmy as far as I can tell is mostly dup posts and blind links, especially links to youtube. The absence of Spez is of course priceless, but otherwise Lemmy is duller than plenty of single-issue blogs or forums, or even the still-decaying corpse of Usenet. That article is about Mastodon, which has a different crowd than Lemmy does. I’m not big on the “follower” model though, so I’m not there very much.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      While that’s true, I don’t believe it to be a fundamental property of the medium or federation in general. I think what we are experiencing is the result of lack of mainstream attention and traffic.

      The people here are much less demographically diverse than the public at large, and have intentionally sought out this space and others like it, so they have more of a sense of ownership and community about it. The more attention it gets, the more the demographics will change to reflect the broader public, and the more it will become like a public space, complete with all the ills that come with that, like advertisers vying for attention, shills posing as enthusiasts, and influencers saying what will get them the most followers, rather than what they think.

      I believe it would take extensive moderation and amazing tools to keep places like this the same as they gain users. I haven’t ever seen a community survive that kind of growth and retain its original spirit, but I also haven’t seen one with no profit motive. If we can get the moderation tools where they need to be, there could be hope!

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is no effective way to ban a person. As long as that remains true, moderation tools don’t really matter.

        Israel alone is putting $760 million into propaganda. Lemmy may not be big, but it’s worth 0.2% of that budget.

        And that’s just Israel.

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think that’s trying to solve the wrong problem.

          If I had awesome moderating tools, identifying and deleting comments that violate the policy would be effortless. I would not need to ban a person, which as you aptly point out, can reappear forever. But, I can ban all of his violating comments, which are, after all, the true target and violation, not the commenter.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the community is a good size right now. Popular enough that we guarantee getting any content of relevance I care about, but not popular enough to have all the problems you mentioned. I hope the community stays this size and off the radar indefinitely.

      • cinoreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, Lemmy feels this way almost exclusively because it’s small and hasn’t been noticed by mainstream media enough. The second that changes this place will become what reddit was pre-ipo.

        • PlantJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          My hope is that it will always be a little too disjointed to hold that kind of attention for long.