Welp…

  • merdaverse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least give it a cool name like The (John) Galt Party or something so it has a better change of splitting the right. I guess the nazi party was already taken?

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      he’s just so bad with names. Surprised he didn’t call it the X Party. wouldn’t that have been more “cool”? surprised he didn’t ask Grok to come up with party names, I mean hell I use chatgpt to come up with names for videogame characters and it works well.

      This is going to fizzle out when he inevitably gets distracted by something else.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He isn’t trying to split the right, he actually thinks he can win because he’s a fucking narcissist. So they will siphon votes from Democrats by pretending to be pro-Gaza and all of the kids who refuse to read a fucking book will buy it and vote for them.

    • lando55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m all for it. If Brewster’s Millions taught me anything it’s that involving yourself in US politics is the quickest way to lose vast sums of money.

  • dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Opportunity for a 4-way split? Sanders and AOC can make a new party called “Freedom Party” so we can have something other than the establishments.

  • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Now do another 10 or 20 parties more and maybe america could finally become a democratic country.

  • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    You support Elon Musk’s party because the Republicans ripped you off.

    I support Elon Musk’s party because it will dilute the voters.

    We are not equal.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the “Never Trumper” moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Republican never Trumper that doesn’t vote GOP is likely vanishingly small. They all fall in line.

          It might siphon off the GOP voters that begrudingly fell in line because they bought the Communist Kamala or something, or the ones that needed to see Trump disaster a second time.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Especially not their opinion column but I’m just posting here because it’s interesting to see what the neoliberals think about it and it’s a good discussion point

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Washington Post is Murdoch connected as of December 2023 (new leader and Bezos began to flex his muscles at the paper). I hesitate to call it neoliberal. It’s moved right of that.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                If you actually bother to read it (regularly, not just once or twice on selected columns that you saw posted online), you would not think that. The opinion column is very neoliberal with a hint of libertarianism.

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Same with the USA, the US Green Party is funded by Conservative PACs such as Badger Values. If there were left unity then the 8 million people who showed up for Biden 2020 would have shown up for Harris 2024, but a lot of people are convinced the DNC aren’t left enough and that primary elections are shams.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Success means a split of the Republicans, because the vast majority of Dems aren’t going to follow Elon after these last few months.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it splits the republican party and removes the old white billionaires from the dems than I’m 100% for it.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You should check those numbers, because it went 51% to Harris. Splitting that means good things for Dems though. Dilution through stupidity.

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          All/most of them, or a few mediagenic alt-right examples the press can trot out as proof of “young men want fascism and Latin Mass” when they run out of MAGA-hatted Ordinary Americans in flyover-state diners?

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Cut the age blame crap. They did nothing different than the rest of our society. Don’t let our generations fall for the same tactics as the generations before us. Our war needs to be a class war, not some stupid “young people are lazy nowadays” bullshit that EVERY high horse ignorant person has said for the last 200 years. Do the youth a favor and look upon anyone who singles them out and trys to separate us with disgrace. Respect is a 2 way street. Let’s be better

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think your beef should be with all men then. As Trump voters increased in men by age. So you could factually say Gen Z men were the least likely to vote for Trump as well

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The Dems who, since the shock of the Reagan revolution, swore off having a political project beyond “don’t make it worse” but accidentally foreclosed on making things better in the process. More recently, they’ve been heard saying things like “nothing will fundamentally change” in the face of a political situation that is very different from 40 years earlier.

              Basically all the powerful Dems since Bill Clinton. Groups like the Democratic Leadership Council. They’ll poo poo ideas that regularly poll at 80% support across all parties, then spend all their political capital barely carrying a compromise position with 48% support across the finish line.

              I really hope that we’re reaching a tipping point where people who believe in a better world and pursue policies to bring it about can have sustained political success

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

    • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think he’s THAT delusional. But he might be targeting the libertarian crypto fiends and techno-fascists that have gathered around the MAGA platform during the last election.

  • ghostlychonk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    He can fuck right off. I don’t believe him and Trump are actually at odds and I think this is an attempt to create an opposition party that’s even more under conservative control than the Democrats are.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The chances that a real Elon party signifigantly stealing votes from the Republicans to the point it causes an actual vote split is basically nil. The voter base is stupid, but not so stupid to hand a brand new party anything out of the gate.

      Now, controlled opposition, is a foundation of the farce that is Russian democracy, and both DT and Elon are staunch admirers of Putin’s system where its a mob masquerading as a government with total control

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup. At best, this is an attempt at spoiling republican votes to piss off Donald. At worst, it’s an attempt to consolidate power by ensuring all of the followers are united.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the wildest take I’ve seen so far.

      It would split the vote amongst the least same, and consolidate the vote for Dems.

      What’s the upside for Musk here?

      • ghostlychonk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Government contracts for his money-hommorhaging companies. A direct link to corrupt world leaders. The fascists aren’t above rigging elections and I have zero doubt that if they could they’d put control in the hands of the Republicans and place this new bullshit party in over Dems.

        We’re not in a “normal” America, anymore. Billionaires absolutely cannot be trusted.

      • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly! Democrats have been LAZER FOCUSED at making Their voters Happy NO MATTER How Many Republicans they Piss Off!

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    While on one hand I hope that people realize this is literally their government being purchased by a single rich guy and push back… I know they’re far too stupid for that.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve got bad news for you, our government is already owned by the rich. Every government is. That’s the whole point of having a government, it’s how the rich control others.

            • Hegar@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s just what the evidence from pre-history through history supports.

              The rich are the government - from local ‘big men’ style rulers, councils of nobles, mercantile empires from Assyria to the US, to local governments that serve property developers.

              The history of the state is the rich working out ever more sophisticated ways of getting what they want without revolt.

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The most powerful in every society are the ones with the most resources and they’ve always been the ones with the free time to operate a government, which they use to pursue and secure their interests.

          As far back as we have written and archaeological evidence of heirarchical institutions existing, they have been controlled by and on behalf of the rich and powerful.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What kind of shitty click bait is this?

    The richest man in the world officially announced on Saturday that he has officially formed a new political party to challenge Republicans and Democrats alike.

    He fucking tweeted that it was created, literally nothing official.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And when the president tweets it’s for some reason official and should be followed… We live in a really stupid age where the government and politics in the US is governed by social media.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All it takes is for one determined furry to pull up their programming socks and hack into Truth Social and start posting under Trump’s name and we’ll see that dry up real quick, unless he wants to make all his official announcements surrounded by uwu’s and lewd pictures of Pokémon.

        Dollars to donuts it’s going to be stupid easy to do as well, because Trump is incapable of hiring competent employees or of paying whoever he does hire.

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nothing has disappointed me quite so much as leftist US hackers. I refuse to believe that your tech-savvy disrupters are all Nazis.