https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    So this subpoena means they get to review the documents, and presumably in their original state as well?

    So if they get redacted ones, that would be obstruction of justice, but the question becomes did the obstruction of justice happen as a result of his duties of office, or one of personal reasons.

    This still could get worse, even if the information that needs to come out does.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      More pacifying, look how happy everyone is that we scored a major upset… In my opinion, they’re going to Mueller Report this and attempt to sweep it under the rug just like they did the Russian Collusion.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Only if we keep disciplining them. Which is why it is important to say this is a good thing but keeping their current leadership is a bad thing, both in regards to accountability.

            • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Did you hand-stuff all those cats, too? It’s that why they’re arranged in chronological order? To demonstrate your skill progress in the pastime? Just curious.

              • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                What is this, the Spanish Inquisition? Can’t a guy engage in some casual taxidermy without getting the third degree?

                • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  I mean, clearly if the Inquisition were involved, that would be a surprise for everyone, but especially them.

                  Had you found this hobby in their era and locality, you actually might’ve contributed to the onset of The Black Plague, simply by killing cats to feed your need talent.

                  Good thing you’re a late boomer?🤘🏼

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      nah, opportunistic as ever. Main goal here is to stick it to republicans not some “principles”

      • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ya DNC just wants to return to Bush era GOP. This MAGA shit isn’t economically sustainable for their owners.

        • lennee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          that aint happenin, the loyalty trump demands of his ppl is a double edged sword, if he goes under they go with him. Some second grade ppl will try to cling onto is pretending trump was never the driving force but they are doomed to fail. If trump goes under the reps are done for for a while.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            If trump goes under the reps are done for for a while.

            Please stop this wishful thinking. I’ve been hearing this shit for over 4 decades! Oh just wait till Regan is gone! Oh after Bush they are done! Oh after two illegal wars they are done! Oh after Trump 1 they are done for sure! Oh after the pandemic they are done! Oh after the old go away they are done! Now we’re back to oh after Trump goes away they are done.

            These morons are NOT going away. They will vote in lockstep with whatever asshole the GOP produces next and mark my words after Trump worse is coming, because with the GOP it always gets worse.

          • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            GOP are either dumb enough to try or just smart enough to know it’s their only option. While I agree with your assessment of the facts I still think the GOP is trying to have its cake and eat it to with regards to getting rid of trump while keeping his base.

            If they can walk this tightrope until ICE finishes establishing themselves as the national gestapo… they might be able to keep the MAGA train rolling after trump kicks the bucket.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Can’t we just celebrate a win for once without saying they’re not doing enough? This is a good thing any way you look at it.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I think it’s hard to take the DNC seriously when they still let Chuck Shumer drone people to sleep, I mean, speak for the party.

          They’ve snubbed their own party’s progressive caucus for brain dead geriatrics.

          Their leadership has blatantly benefited from insider trading and social welfare while failing to achieve those policies for their constituents.

          Every day the DNC looks more and more like a broken clock that’s only only right when it’s 2 minutes to midnight.

          They really, really, don’t deserve applause at this point. They deserve to be replaced.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          We should celebrate the win for sure! But calling it “spine growth” is delusional, wishful thinking.

        • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          high horse? Hardly. Not having principles and being opportunistic is how they lost last election. Sitting on their hands all this time approving republican bills is a confirmation to that. Epstein has ZERO impact on average worker at this point. Yes criminals have to be in jail and human trafficking is a disgust. However this will affect lives of hundreds while millions are still not protected and Democrats have no intent of protecting working class. Biden flirted with more pro-worker stance and with Haris things were back to status quo. So no, my friend no high horse, just looking realistically.

      • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        They think the Epstein thing might actually stick this time. They’re trying to use that as best they can. Any party would do that

        It might be a strong move for once though. Time will tell.

        • HuskerNation@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m going to ask a honest question because I don’t know the answer. If Trump’s name is on the list, why didn’t Dems release it when Biden was in office? Yes I know that’s a question the right has been asking but I don’t know the answer to it?

          Because I don’t care who’s on the list, Republican or Dem. They all deserve prison

          • mkwt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago
            1. Trump’s in the files, but they probably don’t have the stuff from the wildest conspiracy theories. So there’s going to be a let down no matter what.
            2. There’s a lot of victims in those files who deserve some protection and privacy. Redactions take a lot of manpower, as we’ve seen with this 1000 agent effort. That manpower could be spent on going after live criminals.
            3. Dems in the files too.
          • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Not sure if Biden/dems have given a reasom yet. I believe, typically, the official reason they keep this files secret is they may still intend to take legal action in the future.

            Unofficially, Biden’s AG Merrick Garland really did not go hard against Trump. They let him get away with an attempted coup, not sure if that was at Biden’s request or if he let Garland persuaded him not to.

            Farfetched theory on my part but Biden really tried not to stir the waters, I feel, to avoid a civil war.

            • madcaesar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              My cynical ass thinks Biden didn’t want to set precedence that the rich / president can be held accountable. He naively thought Trump is done anyway, let’s just go back to the status quo and not bother with real consequences for the rich.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Apparently it was under seal by the courts while Ghilaine was on trial, and only became unsealed in Biden’s literal last week in the presidency. And he was trying to do a bunch of things at that time, especially with Ukraine and Israel.

          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Because Biden respected the law. The Epstein files were sealed by a judge until after Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of this year. Biden, by law, couldn’t release the files.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The video was fun to watch to watch.

    If my understanding is right, it just means this sub committee will now subpoena all documents. Not like it will be available to everybody, just available to the lawmakers. You must be a real pedophile-ophile to want to block your committee from having knowledge.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think GOP wants to get rid of Trump but keep MAGA. They’ve simply been unable to manipulate that outcome until now.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s a cult of personality, there is no MAGA without HitlerPig. The moment he assumes room temperature, the knives will come out, and the Dems can sit back and watch the bloodbath.

        Which brings up another point - the Republicans Party is dead, fully replaced by the MAGA Party, and the Dems should make that their policy. They should call an official press conference, declare the Republican Party to no longer exist, and start calling it the MAGA Party in ALL communications. The Republican Party should only be referred to in a historical context, like the Whigs.

        Kill the Republican Party, then watch them flail to revive it when MAGA collapses following HitlerPig glorious death.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The only way they can bifurcate Trump from MAGA is if they have an equally “charismatic” strongman that can take his place. It would especially help if he’s young.

        And it’s not Vance.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m not convinced it can be anyone. Trump is a remarkable combination of horrible, stupid, and snake-oil-salesman charismatic. Anyone less stupid, and the base can tell that he’s just pretending to be like them, and they don’t like it. Anyone less charismatic can’t sell the con. Anyone less horrible would actually be less horrible, so that’d actually be better for all of us, but again I think then the base would turn on them for being insufficiently horrible.

          About the only one I can think of on the public stage right now who checks all those boxes is Marjorie Taylor Greene, and she’s a wOmAn, which also disqualifies her for a good chunk of the Trump base.

          But then again, this is the stupidest timeline, so for all I know they’ll just decide that Ron DeSantis is their new god when Trump finally exits the scene and deny that they ever hated Ron’s stupid fucking guts.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            What a horrible world it’d be if MTG is the first female president of the US.

        • mystik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Be careful what you wish for. It could end up being Musk, with a manchruian citizen in the seat.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s why I keep my eye on Joe Rogan. I mean, folks tell me I’m nuts to think that a charismatic entertainer could make the transition to being President, but I’m not so sure. (/s, to be extra clear) I notice that he’s taking care to distance himself from the regime’s more-unpopular actions, but not break with it wholly.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I kinda agree, but IMO the better way to phrase it is that they don’t have a solid plan. Fascists are stupid. They have to be, right, because they’re building a system that is guaranteed to eat itself. Whoever is in charge always wants more power, which eventually must come from their cohorts, so you can’t do it as a team, at least not if people are using their brains.

  • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The dude literally said “in my opinion the no has it” slight emphasis on singular no. Everyone laughed. Then the vote was counted correctly without incident. It was a joke, people, and this fucking X (formerly twitter) post is capitalizing on the surface-level intentional malinterpretation for rage bait engagement and at least 276 of you fell for it. Do your research. Investigate Tower Seven.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Probably he was forcing his republican turncoats to have thier names recorded with thier vote. Kinda petty since everyone knew who voted which way, but they are petty people.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        No, he was lying and trying to get away with it. If he wanted to count the votes, he would have done what every committee chair has done for (in my understanding) 200+ years, and call for a roll call vote. He wouldn’t lie in the face of an 8-2 vote.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I gotta agree with the other guy. He probably did it for some kind of attention one way or another. I don’t think he intended to get away with it. That said, I do think such things are deplorable. It just that when you use a popularity contest to choose reps, this is what you get.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think he was caught off guard, and tried to stick to his marching orders despite it being obvious that they lost the vote.

            No way this was a joke or something done for attention. That makes no sense.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The dude literally said “in my opinion the no has it” slight emphasis on singular no. Everyone laughed. Then the vote was counted correctly without incident. It was a joke, people

      Are you seriously suggesting that the chairman of a committee miscounted the votes as a joke?

      You cannot be for real. Who the fuck upvotes this shit? Does everyone on this site have 14 fucking alts?

      • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Tell me you didn’t watch the video without telling me you didn’t actually watch the video. The guy calls a recess and then they come back and the vote happens. Timestamp 1:35 for the video in the x post to the relevant claim of “lying” in the presumptive vote count. Incredibly boring government parliamentarian bureaucracy at work. The inner workings of the leviathan exposed to reveal a brief moment of shared humanity, corrupted by a cheap narrative from an anonymous jaggoff capitalizing on the poisonous atmosphere of the child rape scandal. It’s a real nothingburger dude. You gettin all huffed up over me observing (not suggesting) some x poster told an easily disprovable lie on the internet for clicks? “cannot be for real” with your ignorant lazy vibes-based-pearl-clutching ass

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          You’re deluded if you think this was a joke.

          He was caught off guard, and made a stupid choice to try to keep following the marching orders, when put on the spot. He’s been told that he needs to prevent this exact thing from happening, so when he was blindsided by the vote, he panicked and made a split second decision to continue with the orders despite obviously losing the vote.

          • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Also, I thought about it for another ten seconds and what you’re saying is even dumber than it looks on the surface. You say he had orders to prevent exactly this- no it wasn’t, this was a surprise move from the democrats and his position does not afford him any power to “prevent this” and there was an internal schism within the republicans, so wrong on at least three counts. You say he got marching orders- where in the video did you get that from? Are you sure you didn’t just make that up in your head as the thing most likely to go along with what you already believed going into it, what you were primed to believe by the BIG SHOCKING SLAM HEADLINE? You say it wasn’t a joke- how do you explain the fucking laughter coming from the people whose votes he supposedly tried to snub? It was a lighthearted moment complete with a natural beat for comedic effect. You can tell he was being flippant by his particular choice use of the singular noun “no” and the singular conjugation “has” that he intended to draw attention to his surprise and dissapointment that one is in fact less than almost a dozen for comedic effect, which it fucking achieved. Surprise and pretended incongruity with reality are notorious sources for humor. At no point did he actually impede the vote.

            There are kiddie diddlers, and the people protecting them. They are in office. It is real, it is a conspiracy, and no not everyfuckingthing the light touches belongs to the pedophiles. This guy is just doing his job. He didn’t say “In my opinion the no has it [over the obvious chorus of yes]” for attention, you’re right that doesn’t make sense.

            No, he was lying and trying to get away with it. If he wanted to count the votes, he would have done what every committee chair has done for (in my understanding) 200+ years, and call for a roll call vote. He wouldn’t lie in the face of an 8-2 vote.

            this is how i shoulda known for a fact before even starting typing all that shit that you didnt watch the shit, dont know how a parliamentary procedure works, dont know what you’re talking about. You don’t count the votes individually unless it’s called for. You start by listening to how loud the ayes and nays are, making a call, and then when someone, anyone, not just the chair challenges it, then you go to individual roll call. There’s some fuckery you can get up to with this system but this aint it. The system is set up to prevent precisely this kind of lie being baselessly alleged from being possibe to be told. The system worked in this case. You should stop assuming your american public school education prepared you to “understand” this shit cuz its not a 200 year history, this goes back to olde england and arguably ancient greece and by your understanding this is apparently your first time examining this in any detail.

            With all that fucking confidence and outrage too. “Are you suggesting-” Take a breath. You’d uncritically go along with literally just any half-baked not-even-tabloid story if it flattered your existing beliefs or confirmed your predetermined narrative. God help any accused who find you on their jury.

  • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    There is no triumph here.

    I put in a small amount of actual effort and came up with the actual vote in question directly from congress. https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/118526?s=3&r=3

    Here is the entire vote and all surrounding context. The supposed “lie” about the vote count is either made up for engagement bait by whatever anonymous jaggoff still trolls x on their call to activism account, or more cynically, is run by a professional troll trying to intentionally bury the lede about nancy mace defining the word “credible” in relation to her own ethos and the democrats feckless attempt to prevent her from neutering their surprise 11th hour hail mary.

    https://youtu.be/M-Kz6P9nDf0?t=12600

    I was accused of putting too much effort to not understand this. Fuck y’all lazy punkass no-account scrubs I aint gonna try to pull your heads out your asses no more, good luck with all that shit.

    • Ruxias@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Can you help me understand Motion #2 by Mace? I was lead to believe that “credible” wording didn’t stick, but it sounds like you’re saying it actually did? If so, then yeah it leaves a lot open to being left out of the subpoena on that one word alone.

      • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Hey, you’re right! That amendment got struck down! With all the back-and-forth in that video I must have lost track. Good check, thanks!

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    When he was the only person to say no, and then claimed “the noes have it,” that was the funniest gd thing I’ve seen all day. Hahahahahaha!

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    the single person who voted no: “In the opinion of the chair the nos have it”

    the multiple people who voted “yes” laugh at the absurdity and call him out on it

    how fucking brazen a liar

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Trust me bro one more rape charge on the rapist king and we beat fscist trust me bro. It will be a bombshell when everyone finds out what they already know and they SLAM him. One more scandal and we defeat facism trust me bro.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s what really kills me about this whole thing. Dude has never, ever, ever faced a consequence for all the shit he’s done. I’m done hoping, man.

    • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’ll be far, far from the nail in the coffin, but we’re already seeing promising movement among what was normally staunch Trump supporters.

      It’s only one avenue to follow though. We still have to do what we can wherever we can.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        According to who? People on Lemmy/reddit? Wake the fuck up. People on these sites live in a bubble and have no idea what the average person’s opinion is on things.

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is unsurprising.

      But forcing a recorded count does get those Republican Nays on record so they can be punished later.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      MAGAs can’t resist cheating at every opportunity. Here we are again with standard election fraud on a micro basis, but we’re supposed to believe that they won the 2024 Election “Fair & Square?”

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’m not holding my breath but I’m really hoping that will help maga chuds clue in that the GOP are wholly dishonest.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I get what you’re saying, but there are now two very distinct news spheres, and the one that they’re watching will simply not cover this story.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            It has to at least fall under this:

            "§1001. Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

            (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), 108 Stat. 2147 .)"

            https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=49&f=treesort&num=1262

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m guessing Roberts Rules stuff.

      As a quick and dirty thing, you can call a voice vote of ayes and nays. If it’s not particularly close, it’ll be obvious what the outcome is, the Chair will call the result, and everyone moves on. However, any member can call bullshit on the Chair, and then it goes to a more formal process.

      So without watching the whole damn video, it’s probably that the voice vote went one way, the Chair said it was the other, got called on it, and the roll call vote went against him.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    A House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the Department of Justice to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

    The motion passed by a vote of 8-2. Notably, three GOP lawmakers – Reps. Nancy Mace, Scott Perry and Brian Jack – joined with Democrats on the subcommittee to approve the subpoena, defying Republican leadership.

    House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer must sign the subpoena before it can be officially issued, per committee rules. Comer plans to sign off on the subpoena, a Republican committee source told ABC News.

    The top Democrat on the subcommittee, Rep. Summer Lee, initially offered the motion.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m not american, does this committee actually hold the power to release them or is this just a recommendation/symbolic? If rule of law is followed (I know big if) does this guarantee the release or are there still hurdles?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Me neither. It’s the house oversight committee. So it’s my understanding they do have some real power. Though to be honest I don’t know what the scope is.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    sooooo GOP chair who blatantly tried to defraud the American people in a cushy government position by abusing his position, he’s tossed outta the swamp now, right?

    or rather, into the new swamp down in Florida